So how do we come to understand historical outcomes? How can we come to understand the gaps that exist between a series of events? The natural thing to do is to look at the byproduct of a chain of events that took place over 150 years ago and to draw assumptions. Yet assumptions can never be trusted. Assumptions can be correct, or they can lead us astray, they can lead us into a wilderness of non-existent facts and narratives that can't be tested.
I do think the natural byproduct we have come accustomed to is the end result. This end result as we all know by now is the plight of Antonio de la Garza and his family. Yet, the more important question to ask is how did it all begin? How did history lead us to this point? I believe that in order to understand this chain of events and to see it with a clear lens is to take a step back and start at the beginning.
I have a good idea now as to whether Becerra's claim to title is valid or not. I plan on showing that it was. But I will say that my initial instincts were wrong. Don Manuel Becerra did receive his title by the Mexican Government. Yes, he did, and the de la Garza's were the last of the line to have held it. What I gave you was the end. But to see it correctly, we need to start at the beginning. The beginning starts with the story of Manuel Becerra...
Comments
Post a Comment